A life that is just constantly happy would eventually get boring because we wouldn't appreciate how wonderful it is, it would all feel the same eventually. Plus, without having some sadness in our lives, how could we truly know the meaning of real happiness. Constant happiness would be like living like a robot. So, I agreed with Professor George Lowenstein that in his statement ‘A life that was constantly happy was not a good life’.
My experience and adventures called life in its whole translation is not just constructed upon happiness. To experience life and all that it has to offer, one needs to also experience sadness and every emotion that develops. Though I know most individuals seek happiness in life, one needs to have the awareness and understanding that life is "good" even when happiness does not enter the picture. For an individual to constantly be "happy" in life, they miss the despair of seeing the harshness of reality that this life does offer. Seeing a child in a third world country hopping on one leg and fighting a group of children for a handful of fish because he has not ate in two days does not bring happiness to me. (That example was from a documentary called "Darwin's Nightmare".)
A life that was constantly happy was a very fortunate life so therefore it should only be a good thing to be constantly fortunate in life, even into its best. We can also learn from being steadily happy. However we may all know that there is no such thing as constantly happy in life. We adjust ourselves up to with those ups and downs.
I feel like if we don't experience the full range of emotions, the happiness that we feel constantly might become flat. We might start taking it for granted, and sadness just makes the happiness that much better’. If our life is good, then it all seems normal routine when we do something fun, let's say we go surfing every week, it's all normal for us and it could even get boring!
If someone has a...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document